Changing the Story

Changing the Story

It all comes down to this:  There are a lot of stories to choose from, and many of them make the world a smaller and darker place.  I can live in a story told by others about me, the story of someone who has no right to demand or intrude.  I can live the only child story, the eldest child, the middle child, the youngest child story.  I can take on the I’m always right story or the I can’t be wrong story.  I can define myself in the story of the put-upon, overlooked, neglected victim left to press his nose against the window of the restaurant of life while those inside dine to their heart’s content, ordering what they will from a menu devised for them by a universe that plays favorites.  I can hide in the story of designated scapegoat, the malignant black sheep, expected to run riot and bring collateral damage to all around me.  I can fine-tune the entitlement story, the martyr story, the underappreciated saintly spiritual giant story, the wounded bird story, the distant intellectual story, the stoic story, the emotional disaster story, the care too much story, the I-don’t-give-a-rip story, and so on.

I am the story I tell myself.  Of course I’m also my history, the sum total of the decisions, circumstances, and accidents that lump up all together to make up what I laughingly call my past.  I can’t change my history; les jeux sont fait and all that, but I’m increasingly aware that I can change my story.

The facts of the story are bound to remain the same; I still begin in the same place and end up here, writing on an April morning in Oregon after stops of various lengths in Connecticut, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida, Massachusetts, Switzerland, Alabama, and California.  I’m still married to the same wonderful person and still a doting parent to three wonderful (now adult) children.

But, you know, facts are just facts.  The story I tell myself is all about the lens through which I consider these allegedly inviolable facts.  It may be helpful at this point to announce that I’m not about to descend into a “Power of Positive Thinking” lecture, not that I have an issue with positive thinking, but rather that this exercise has to do with ways of being, not stratagems or advantaged outcomes.  I’m also not proposing puppies and kittens, wide-eyed, gosh and golly, everything is just peachy and exactly the way it is supposed to be, unexamined, flatline, brain numbing self-satisfaction.

Some of my story I will tell to others; some of it will remain unspoken.  Unedited, it is the program that runs constantly in the background, reminding me of what and who I think I am.  As Descartes ought to have said:  “I think, therefore I am… I think”, and I hardly know what to think.  I think I’ve been exceedingly fortunate, occasionally graceful, frequently thoughtless, and often petulant.  The story I tell myself today is about latching on to the intimations of what a fairly limited human such as I can do to treat the universe with care, hoping to act in ways that do no harm, and taking responsibility for my choices and my emotions.

That’s not the most gripping yarn, but that’s my story, and I’m sticking to it … until it’s time to change.

 

 

 

Genius

Genius

They walk among us, prodigies, people whose abilities are distinctly superior, so remarkable that I find myself retreating to my room, drawing the blinds, humming tuneless, repetitive nonsense syllables, and determining to no longer afflict the universe with my uninspired commentary on things observed. I don’t know why it still catches me by surprise.

What sets off this particular appreciation of the distance between normal people and those who possess true genius?  The latest jarring insight came from a trio of documentaries, any one of which might have been more than enough to convince me that some abilities simply cannot be taught or inspired.

The first was CineSpace 17, the latest in an ongoing competition sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in which enterprising makers of short films make use of imagery and video captured by NASA over the last fifty years.  I hadn’t realized that documentation of every adventure in space has been placed in an open source from which any of us can access images of spacewalks and the variations in the rings of Saturn or on the surface of Jupiter.  The short films were impressive, but as they appeared on-screen, I was reminded that somebody with a brain conspicuously larger than mine had imagined the fabrication of devices that travel the universe and the mechanics necessary to extraterrestrial adventure.  Engineering a supercomputer able to direct a lunar mission was impressive; the thought of engineering a phone with greater computing power than a supercomputer boggles the mind.  Oh, and I’ll take any comprehensible explanation of how the operation of duplex radio systems have anything to do with my ability to tell my wife to pick up some yogurt on her way home.

So, yes, science and engineering operate in realms I cannot negotiate.  Hats off!  Kudos!  Please find a way to clone Polar Bears and Tigers before they disappear and good luck with weather and earthquakes.

The second documentary, Score, presents an inside look at the process by which film scores are created.  I’m always eager to get the inside story on anything having to do with film, and when teaching Film Studies frequently asked students to pick a sequence that was substantially enhanced by its score.  The shower scene in Psycho offered the most dramatic illustration; shown without sound, the manipulation of camera angle and pattern of editing become transparent and the shock of horror is lost.  So, I walked in expecting to hear a bit about Bernard Herrmann, John Williams, Hans Zimmer, maybe Henry Mancini, and I did find out a great deal about them … and another twenty-six composers whose scores have absolutely shaped my response to the films they have scored.

The first level of genius then is with the composers, all of whom appear to play at least thirty instruments and understand composition so completely that knocking down an original score that is entirely appropriate to a director’s vision on what is a very demanding timetable seems no problem at all.  Imagine screening a film with a director.  There is no sound.  The director grunts clipped commentary:  “I want suspense … here!  But romantic suspense, you know?  Not scary, just you know tightens up the sphincter”.

The composer takes notes, asks questions, walks away and produced a musical analog to the film in something like two weeks, fully orchestrated and ready for production.  The work of John Williams can be taken for granted until we realize that even though we feel Star Wars was always with us, there was no Star Wars Theme, no celebratory music as the rebel alliance presents medals to Han, Luke, and Chewie.  There was no ominous theme as Darth Vader appears.  There was no jolting rasp of cello, bass, trombone, and tuba indicating the relentless grinding approach of the shark in Jaws.

I’ve seen Schindler’s List at least fifteen times, weep every time, and know by heart the music that accompanies each scene; I have only to hear one of Williams’ themes, and I feel the texture of the moment it was composed to convey.  And yet, I have considered Spielberg the genius, overlooking the essential role Williams played in my response to the film.

As the composers were interviewed, I understood what they had brought to films that I had considered primarily visual experiences.  Edward Scissorhands – Danny Elfman, The Silence of the Lambs – Howard Shore, The Shawshank Redemption – Thomas Newman, The Royal Tenenbaums – Mark Mothersbaugh, Gone Girl – Atticus Ross.

My favorite film of the last five years, perhaps one of the the ten best films in my pantheon of films, Mad Max: Fury Road, spectacular in any presentation, including a fabulous large screen version  in black and white, Mad Max: Fury Road in Black and Chrome, is absolutely dependent on the bizarre and brilliant score by Thomas Holkenborg who is also responsible for an almost equally compelling score for Deadpool.  I knew drums were a key element in keeping the fury in Fury Road, but I had no conception of the number and variety of drums Holkenborg assembled to beat the audience into satisfied submission.

Composers now belatedly but emphatically recognized, my attention then turned to the orchestras summoned from their various other employments to sight-read scores of incredible complexity and pull together a concert worthy performance in the course of a few days.  Of course these are virtuosos, among the best orchestral musicians, but the precision and art with which they transform the composer’s intent into a fully scored soundtrack is stunning.  The good news is that scoring films probably keeps orchestral music alive and well; the better news is that there are some hundred musical prodigies on call day and night.

The third documentary, The Beatles: Eight Days a Week, is Ron Howard’s tribute to the Beatles in their touring years, from the Cavern Club in Liverpool to their last concert in San Francisco, from 1962 to 1966.

Let’s just start with several unlikely circumstances.  Eight Days a Week reminds us that there was no expectation that the phenomenon that was the Beatles would last any longer than the usual combustive teen frenzy.  Albums were scheduled at six month intervals in order to pack in as many as possible before the bubble burst.  “The bubble burst” conversation fills year after year of the Beatles’ dominance of popular music.  It is equally significant that the entire catalog of music composed and performed by the Beatles was completed in the course of four years.

How many songs are in that catalog?  That turns out to be more complicated than one might think.  Without considering experimental pieces that were never released and various other unrecorded pieces, the Beatles recorded 429 songs, 172 of which were covers, 237 which were original compositions.  Toss in the various unrecorded and unreleased and the number of original songs is probably closer to 300, remembering that McCartney and Lennon also wrote for Billy J Kramer and the Dakotas, Peter and Gordon, Cilla Black, and Badfinger.

No matter how the account is settled, on average, they wrote a song every week.  Howard’s film primarily concerns the years in which the Beatles toured, a regimen Ringo asserts that derived from the relatively paltry income they derived from record sales and their need to play as many concerts as possible to bank what they could before, you know, “the bubble burst”.  So, excusing the less than remarkable songs, and the very few incompletely admired songs (Maggie Mae?  Piggies?  Revolution9?  Rocky Racoon?  Honey Pie?), the preponderance of the spectacular catalog was written or conceived on the road.  McCartney playing left-handed guitar, Lennon playing right-handed, they traded melodies across the beds in hotel suites, in limos, on airplanes.

How many songs deserve to be termed truly memorable (in a good way)?  Leaving sentiment and memories of a lost youth aside, most students of popular music would give them between 50 and a hundred.  More informed critics than I have argued that the only comparison in terms of numbers of excellent compositions would be with Mozart, which opens yet another composition about the nature of genius as Mozart composed alone while the Beatles’ work is collaborative to some degree.  I happen to be equally impressed with genius as it emerges in collaboration, recalling every collaboration and meeting I have ever attended as lessons in patience and not likely to result in groundbreaking brilliance.  As my favorite supplier of posters, Despair Inc., provider of Demotivators, reminds me, “Meetings:  None of us is as dumb as all of us” .

This piece set out to explore genius as exhibited by individuals, however, and no matter how strictly the definition of genius the singularity of remarkable ability, there seem to be a lot of them out there.

What a treat it is to run into them when they surface.  Since I truly am delighted and confounded by choreographers, dancers, actors, artists, mathematicians, computer scientists, athletes at the top of their game, and stunned by the fluidity with which they meet challenge and the ease with which they summon invention again and again, I probably have to pull the blinds, leave my room, open my ears and eyes and see them as they soar by.

 

Bertha And The Blueberry Country Club For Cats

Bertha And The Blueberry Country Club For Cats

Some ideas spring unbidden, leap into consciousness with indelible impact, embed themselves so resolutely as to be impervious to the ordinary tidal pull of memories saved and memories lost.

Such was my experience in overhearing a seemingly competent woman release a torrent of vituperation toward a person named Bertha, apparently the owner or manager of an enterprise known as The Blueberry Country Club for Cats.  Propriety demanded that I quietly withdraw from the blast zone, lest my uninvited observation of the dismembering of Bertha’s character add even greater impetus to the roiling disaffection for Bertha and, I supposed, her disgruntlement with the Blueberry Country Club, and perhaps with cats.

I longed to know more of Bertha’s betrayal; had there been simple mismanagement of cat care, an unhappy encounter with a particular cat or band of cats?  Surely the misstep, Bertha’s I guessed, had been singularly egregious to warrant the amount of venom sprayed in the few seconds of immoderate recrimination I had witnessed.  I longed to eavesdrop until the details of the battle became clear.  Stories are all about us; I am shameless in appropriating stories and sensed that at least two or three could be tapped from title, “Bertha and the Blueberry Country Club For Cats”.

I could take the obvious path and invent a story about a sensitive girl from Nebraska, young Bertha, daughter of hardworking beet farmers, simple folks not afraid of hard work and fond of beets.   I could give her kind and loving parents, well-meaning but unable to imagine a world beyond the confines of farm and vegetables.  Chafing at the strictures of life on the prairie and comforted only by her cat, Blueberry, and the books she’s found at the local library, the clever girl finds herself in Lincoln, a graduate of the University, poised and at ease, she thinks, in the company of the city’s elite.  Invited to balls and galas at the snazzy Husker Club, Bertha delights in the amenities a club affords, abandoning her parents and her once-beloved Blueberry.

I haven’t decided what indignity Blueberry has to suffer in order to signal Bertha’s perfidy, but something nasty separates girl and cat.  Borrowing heavily from every teen film ever made and with a tip of the hat to the Disney bathos factory, I could put Bertha in a painful scene in which her new-found friends reveal their mocking contempt for her small town wardrobe and values, leaving her weeping bitterly and longing for the comfort of true friendship.  Racing back to her apartment, Bertha intends to set things right with Blueberry, but Blueberry, anticipating Bertha’s distress, has set out to find her at the country club.  It’s not much in the way of irony, but the third act needs some suspense.  Yadda yadda, reunion, reconciliation, tears and promises, a wiser and better Bertha turns the tables, makes a fortune, and rewards Blueberry by building a country club for her and for cats of all every size, shape, and color.  Happy ending, sniff, sniff.

I am aware that this may not be a story worth the telling; it could be seen as more than familiar and not all that instructive.  There are bigger concerns in a complicated world, concerns, for example, about the essential and innate characteristics of cats.  Let’s just leave Bertha out of it.

I am fond of animals in general including cats, but I avoid Cat Whisperers, My Cat From Hell, and Meowmania.  I choose not to search for blogs such as “Des Hommes et des Chatons”, “Dressing Your Cat”, “Popular Songs Performed by Cats”, and “Rowdy Kittens At Play”.  Have I visited “The Infinite Cat Project”, in which cats watch each other?  I have not, although the chain of cats has now passed two hundred and fifty, which is an impressive number of cats watching cats.

Questions are bound to arise when I introduce “Des Hommes et des Chatons” (Of Men and Kittens), a site which pairs cats with hunky men who most resemble them.  I don’t want to get into any aspect of that enterprise, even as I recognize the hours of research its authors must invest in order to keep the pairs well matched.  Keep your questions to yourselves, or hop on whatever hunk/guy/kitten chat room you frequent and let them fly.

No, it was the Country Club aspect that got me.  Would I have been as puzzled by a Country Club for Dogs?  I think not.

In the first place, dogs would be inclined to join a club; a pack is essentially a club without a golf course.  Cats don’t travel in packs; they are independent and … well, let’s leave it at independent.  Yes, Lions hunt in prides, but they are the only felines that do, and they aren’t hanging out together as pals.  Take away the advantages of bagging zebras and hartebeasts as a pride, and lions go their separate ways.

Then, dogs are pretty much always associated with sport.  Big lumpy dogs gambol through meadows and marshes not just to put something alive, or recently alive, in their mouths but because they find snorkling along fun; it amuses them. Smaller dogs harry, or chase things up trees, or stuff their snouts in burrows.  Dogs fetch and catch frisbees; toss the ball and you have a friend for life.  Try tossing a ball for a cat and see what you get.  Dogs compete in a variety of athletic contests, enjoying the challenge and rising to the competition.  And what do they hope for as their reward?   A pat on the head or the toss of another frisbee.

Dogs and sport make sense.

Cats do not compete.  They hunt and disembowel things; they leave heads and body parts on the doorstep.  Silent stalking and lashing tails bring the pounce of the carnivore, but the hunt is hardly sport; cats don’t wander home after a day of not killing something content with the thrill of the hunt.

Cat.  Mouse.  No contest.  Where’s the sport in that?

The closest a cat comes to sport is in toying with prey, allowing them just enough room to start an escape, only to find they are playthings in the paws of a sadistic predator.  There may be a club for that sort of diversion, but that’s a story for another day.

I have to be content with the mystery that clouded the Bertha and cat outrage; I’m certain the real story is far richer than any I might imagine, so I walk away, grateful for a world that continues to offer surprise and wonder.

 

 

 

Don’t Blame Me

Don’t Blame Me

I must have been six or seven when in a fit of scientific curiosity I determined to find out what would happen if I played our family piano with a hammer.  No need to provide graphic illustration of my findings; some things are best left to the imagination.  In any case, stepping on the chips of piano keys on the floor, my step-father confronted me, demanding to know if I had been the agent of destruction.  The hammer still in my hand, I denied any responsibility for whatever alleged misdeed he might have in mind.  My brother was two at the time; his hammering skills would improve quickly, but he was clearly not capable of the damage I had wrought.  In the moment, facing accountability, recognizing the absurdity of trying to weasel away, did I blame him?  Did I evade and equivocate?

Uh, yup.

Two questions emerge now:

I had the hammer in my hand; who did he think had whacked the keys into pulp?

I had the hammer in my hand; why did I think denial was in any way a plausible response?

I’m not sure that my step-father could have had a worse opinion of my trustworthiness than he already possessed, but in that moment, I had a worse opinion of my trustworthiness, an opinion I have been carrying ever since.  Of course I should have owned up; what the heck, the evidence was overwhelming.  Beyond the legacy of that moment, this was but one of many situations that I wish I had handled differently.

So, one obvious outcome of ducking responsibility and blaming is an erosion of self-esteem.  Even if I avoid or postpone an outcome that I want to avoid, I know the truth I did not tell.  I feel lousy.  Again.  I have friends who remind me that if I want self-esteem, the quickest path is to do estimable things.  So, there’s that.

An even more obvious outcome of blaming is that it accomplished nothing worthwhile.  No pianos were un-smashed, no step-father was comforted, no hammer wielding kid was congratulated on his initiative.

Then, as the alleged piano debacle proved, my relationship with my step-father was forever informed by that moment.  I was young, sure, but I established the certainty that I could not be trusted to tell the truth.

Why begin this discussion of the cost of blaming?

I’ve heard an awful lot of blaming in the last few weeks as a new administration meets the complexity of contemporary issues, and I am worried by it.  Political opinions aside, action seems more profitable than reaction.  I’m no expert in the field, but I’m pretty sure that blaming isn’t coping.  As is always the case, my observations are purely my own and based on my own experience, and from what I’ve observed as a world-class blamer over the decades, the more I cast blame, the worse I make things and the worse I feel.

That’s an interesting side-effect that always takes me by surprise.  I am as resistant to accountability as the next shiftless character, but even I feel a twinge when I duck and run.  I’m not immune to guilt, and there are plenty of situations in which I should feel guilty, but this twinge comes in my realization that I have given away a bit of my own agency when I shove responsibility out of my path. I will admit that I have not been all that willing to grow up, and my first instincts may still slide right back to kindergarten, but over the years a tiny voice has called again and again:

“What would an adult do?”

More often than not, in almost any situation, an adult would  take responsibility for his or her part in situations as they arise, consider options carefully, and act in the best interest of all concerned.

Even when the situation is messy.

Stuff happens.  It just does.  Despite best intentions, thoughtful planning, and high expectations.

So here we are, with unanticipated and messy stuff happening all around us; the world seems to become more complicated day by day.  Of all the tools at our command, blame may be the first to come out of the cupboard, but it never really does much to improve the mess.  The danger is that with each blaming reaction, coping skills atrophy; other responses are shoved deeper into the cupboard.  Habits die hard and new behavior takes conscious effort and a willingness to try to do better.  For retrograde characters such as I, coping actually takes practice.

For example, say I open a letter from the IRS and retreat immediately to blaming – the postal service, previous employers, the Federal Government, FDR, Wall Street, the kind volunteer who helped me prepare my tax return, the guy next door who might have slimed his way out of paying his share, my grade school teacher for not making sure I knew how to add and subtract, and on and on.

Hmmmm.  The letter is still in my hands.  The IRS is apparently not interested in my catalog of defamations.  I’m back to asking what an adult would do, slapping my forehead, remembering the small steps toward responsibility such as opening the letter, reading it, reading it again, driving to the local IRS office, clarifying what is needed, then doing the next appropriate thing in order to move on.

It doesn’t seem that hard when I look at from a hypothetical point of view.  Drop me headfirst into a mess, and I need to some time to remember my intention to respond as a responsible adult might respond.  It takes practice.

I’m getting better.  I really am.  I admit that there are a few charges I haven’t dropped yet.  Nothing serious, but still.  Moving on, I should release with love the person who sold me the Buick LeSabre knowing that it was about to fall off  both axles.  That’s on me; I should have looked under the car.  I did leave my comic books and baseball cards at home when I spun out into the world; I miss them, but that’s on me as well.  No reason to assume parents would know that the only possessions I cared about should not be pitched in a landfill somewhere in rural Connecticut.

Moving on.  That’s what Ebay is for, but if this article provokes you to buy Power Ranger figurines or a Mr. Ed lunchbox, don’t blame me.

 

 

 

 

The Envelope, Please

The Envelope, Please

I am writing at the start of April when seniors have been admitted or denied admission, and when ambitious juniors feel the pressure to get serious about their college search.  Both are moments of momentous decision, and both bring a complex of issues and emotions, for students and for families.

All of which comes to mind this morning as three friends have called in the last few days, two at the end of the search and one about to begin in good earnest.  I know the three students and their parents and like all parties, and I worked for almost forty years as a college counselor, so the phone calls bring welcome activity and a reminder of why I enjoyed going to work every day.  College counselors are privileged to meet students at a point in their lives at which they need and welcome serious conversations about their interests and their aspirations.  They do not entirely welcome the  ongoing reality checks along the way, SAT scores, course choices, grades, but they understand that they will need to be aware of how their strengths and choices will be assessed by people who have the authority to open a gate or swing it shut.

The combinations and permutations of college choices are endless, and the first sweep almost always has to consider location, size, cost, special programs, and what my kids call the vibe and I call the culture.

I entered the field with a bias towards small liberal arts colleges, a bias that probably affected my own children in their search.  Two ended up at colleges (Whitman and Lewis and Clark) that suited them well although they each came to their college in a slightly round-about fashion.  The experiences of all three now inform my judgment, perspective that arrived just as I left my career and began spending my days mowing the meadow.

One of my children is what I might call a polymath; he reads widely, is an informed student of politics and economics, displays astute critical response to contemporary culture, particularly film and music.  When he began his college search, my thought was that only a liberal arts education could satisfy his wide range of interests.  Over the past twenty years, however, I’ve learned that he didn’t need course work to stimulate and develop his mind; as a high school junior, this guy was reading Thomas Pynchon for pleasure.  The Core curriculum in his liberal arts college was intended to provide a wide vista across the range of subjects; in his case, it just put obstacle after obstacle in his way, sticking him in required courses that were brain numbing.  After graduation, he learned a zillion computer languages on his own and is now a highly regarded developer of software applications, but he probably should have gone to film school at USC, UCLA, or NYU.  He’s writing screenplays in his spare time, several of which might actually hit the screen; film school would have given him the professional skills and connections to work at what he loves best.

I wish I’d known then…

The two round-about kids also taught me some important lessons.

One took a gap year without any particular plan in mind.  The goal was not continuing self-improvement but simply allowing a little space and time from the hard work he had done in his high school years.  He didn’t do community service, he didn’t save turtles in the Galapagos.  He slept a lot, which turned out to be important, and he took classes at our city college, taking his interest in songwriting and in guitar to the next level.  He got very good, and had the chance to perform his own work a bit, got some rest, and was ready to take advantage of everything his college had to offer.

The city college turned out to be a great experience for my daughter as well.  Not only did she save an incredible amount of money by spending two years in a liberal arts program that prepared her for transfer, she also got excellent instruction in a variety of subjects.  She met great professors who provided mentorship as she readied to go on in the field that had captured her attention, psychology; that preparation was sound enough that shortly after transferring, she was selected to assist her professor in a significant research project.  It isn’t easy to find one’s place in a new school, but she got involved with everything from the organization of orientation of new students to the newspaper, ending up an editor as well as a member of the college’s judicial board.

My foresight was far from twenty-twenty.  Until my own children found their own paths, I had a limited view of what a college education should be.  I am grateful to them for showing the way; they are, in part, responsible for the inclusion of a variety of colleges and universities I describe in America’s Best Kept College Secrets, a guide identifying colleges of quality and character not as recognized for their strengths as they should be.  Great opportunities are available in institutions of all sorts, and all sorts of roads lead to them.

One great difference between choices now and those years ago is that there are now a constellation of public liberal arts colleges, institutions with relatively small enrollment offering a broadly based adventure in the liberal arts at a state school price.  There are now great public options in every region, from Evergreen State in Washington to Fort Lewis College in Colorado, from Southern Oregon University in our town, Ashland, to Division I University of North Carolina Asheville.

The phone calls from friends remind me of the anxiety which surrounds the choice of a college or university.  I’m never able to fully ease the dilemma that arises with tough choices, but I do resort to a single question that has made all the difference in my own life.  Every college has classes, professors, libraries, and gymnasia; every college has a social scene, dining halls, and dormitories.

I made my college choice based on an aesthetic impulse; my college looked like what I thought a college should look like.  It was also important that I had vistas to look at from every corner of the campus.  Not very ambitious or intellectual, but that campus sustained me through all the bumps and bruises the college years can bring.

So, what sustains you?  Putting aside all the shoulds, what do you love?  What can you not do without?

I’m still dedicated to finding vistas, answering the phone while looking out at fields and meadows and the tall evergreen trees of the Pacific Northwest.  It seems absurd to advise a high school senior to follow his or her bliss, but in the end, that is really the only advice that matters.

Except for cost.  Oh, Location.  Uh, facilities …

 

I’m embarrassed to say …

I’m embarrassed to say …

Twice in the last week I’ve run into someone who called me by the wrong name  Not a big deal at all, and yet, I felt embarrassed enough for both people that I had to think long and hard about correcting them or just letting it go.

It got complicated quickly; I had to do a rapid scan of my social network to consider the likelihood of encountering these folks again in a setting in which they would be made uncomfortable by using the wrong name again, or in which I would be made uncomfortable at hearing the wrong name and not responding.

Or responding.

It seemed unlikely that I would have the opportunity to see them at a distance, prepare myself, and approach saying something like, “Hey, I’m Peter, how ARE you?”  I am not prepared to wear a t-shirt proclaiming, “Hey, My Name Is Peter – Don’t Forget!”, and if I were to get a tattoo, it would have to be something more meaningful than my own name (which I do, in fact, remember), like an entire spread on my back showing Odysseus slaying the suitors.

OK, that might be too much.

It isn’t easy to respond in the moment with the clarity that a few minutes of reflection might afford.  I often wish that I had rehearsed every conceivable socially awkward encounter so that I had a ready response.  In this case, the jumble amplified as I considered two possibilities:  If the speaker were to be embarrassed by my correction, he might decide it is easier to avoid me than to repeat the error.  On the other hand, if I did not correct the speaker, I might decide to avoid him  in order to avoid … well … whatever.

I should probably admit that I do not have the ability to read minds and have absolutely no idea of how anyone is likely to respond to anything.  This impulse to protect another person, a person I hardly know, from embarrassment seems a bit shady.  The impulse is to protect myself.

From what?  From shame.

Why should I be ashamed of responding with my own name?  I’ve done nothing wrong, I’m not inappropriately dressed, there’s no spinach in my teeth.  The thing about shame is that it doesn’t care; it comes on quickly, hits hard, and tells me to move, duck, squeal, yell – anything but stand around feeling shame.  Another thing about shame is that it does not have to be attached to the event that precipitates the response.  Once shamed, forever capable of feeling shame.

The condition I describe is not healthy, and I and others have done a lot of work to see things as they actually are rather than things we might imagine them to be. For the most part, I summon a balanced response to most situations.  But in the moment …

I silenced the voices in my head by recalling the rehearsal that I have done in order to meet moments such as these with some grace.  I said what I had rehearsed saying.

“I am embarrassed to say that my name isn’t Paul.”

I can own my discomfort and indicate that the issue for me is tiny.  The other guy can respond in any way he likes.

It works for me in other situations as well.  When my pancakes are undercooked and slightly pasty, I can tell the waitron, “I’m embarrassed to ask the chef to slap these babies back on the griddle, but they just have too much slither for me in their present state.”  If I forget a name, it is not the worst thing in the world to say, “I am embarrassed to admit that I have forgotten your name.”  I think it indicates that I take calling the person by the name seriously; it’s certainly better for me than the weasely shuffling I would have to do to avoid admitting that the name was gone, gone, gone.

It is probably worth noting that these small statements of honesty don’t injure me at all; once I get past the conviction that I should always be right, anything is possible.  Fortunately, the universe continues to shatter that conviction on a daily basis, so I have the freedom to admit whatever I need to admit.  A lot.

 

Inquiring Minds Want To Know

Inquiring Minds Want To Know

You will recall that in the wake of the unexpected results of the referendum calling for the immediate exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union there were numerous accounts of massive google searches in the UK the day AFTER the referendum.  The most commonly asked questions included, “What is the EU?” and “What countries are in the EU?”

Thus the efficacy of the democratic process was assured once again, but the story did propel me toward an investigation of the questions we, as informed Americans, ask the all-knowing googleverse.

It will come as no surprise that Pokemon, Prince, the IPhone7, Melania Trump, and Simone Biles were widely searched.  The entire “Is it healthy…” domain once again emerges as a constant theme in our national search history.  Some make eminently good sense; “Is it healthy to be a Vegan?”  Sure.  Reasonable question.  On the other hand, “Is it healthy to eat your boogers?” seems a question best left unexamined as is, “Why does my arm shake when I eat dirt”.  Some questions are more poignant than others.  “Are there people who never find love?”; some are oddly provocative, “What would happen if I hired two private investigators to follow each other?”

A state-by-state survey of questions asked raises some disturbing issues with regard to the demographic diversity of the United States.  Some states ask certain questions more frequently than others; for example, Georgians ask the question, “Why do my nipples hurt” more than any other state while insecure Floridians ask, “Why does everyone hate Florida?”  Some questions appear widely and one would think appropriately, such as, “When is Ramadan?” West Virginians, however, may have missed a clue in asking, “When is Cinco de Mayo?”

In terms of frequency with which questions were asked last year, drought damaged Californians had every right to ask, “Was 2016 the worst year ever?”.  At another level, it makes sense that Oklahomans wondered about Kevin Durant’s decision to pay for the Oakland Warriors.

I don’t quite know what to do with the split between North and South Dakotans.  Learning of his death, South Dakota wanted information on Elie Wiesel; North Dakotans either wanted more information about or showtimes of “Dirty Grandpa”.

Connecticut wanted more insight into the Comey letter whereas Delaware craved the details of the “Brangelina” divorce.  West Virginia responded to the death of Muhammad Ali with interest in his life and legacy; Tennessee wondered if Mr. T had actually died. (I’m pleased to report that Mr. T is alive, well, and ready to pity as many fools as come his way).  Michigan, home to Hockeytown USA, googled extensively about hockey hero Gordie Howe while Missouri, the “Show Me” state, wanted evidence that McDonald’s actually did intend to serve breakfast all day.

As to why North Dakotans ask the question, “When is the NFL draft?” more frequently than any other state while South Dakotans ask,”Why is my poop green”  remains a mystery.

I’ll google it and let you know what I find out.

 

Flying Monkeys

Flying Monkeys

In the midst of writing an article about witches in film, momentarily sidetracked by memories of the goon squad sent out by the Wicked Witch of the West, I set out to find an image to assure myself that they were as disturbing as I had remembered them to be.

They were and are.  Let’s remember that by the time the monkeys arrive, Oz is saturated with color; slippers are sparkling, Glenda is numinous, but the blinking monkeys  are trapped in vile carpeting, matted greyish blue quasi-fur.  Yes, they wear hats, but that doesn’t make things better.  At all.  I found that they present the same frozen grimace in every shot; they can fly, swarm, and bark in laughter, but their eyes are dead and their features immobile.  All of which would be more than enough to find them off-putting, and then we recall that small actors, largely uncredited actors, are stuck inside that greasy fur, suspended over the Technicolor landscape by wires, and almost certainly not writing home about the part they played in this American film masterwork.

Disturbing then.  Disturbing now.

Disturbing also the information that came unbidden as I searched for “flying monkeys”.  It turns out that the term “flying monkeys” has been appropriated as an economical way of describing those who act as minions of true narcissists, the idea being that apologists, enablers,those who work to smooth things out, allow the narcissist to persist in abusive behavior.  The number of websites dedicated to the protection of victims caught in abusive traps by narcissists and their enabling minions indicates the existence of a problem I had only vaguely understood.

Let me backup a bit.  I’ve met my share of bullies and know a number of people whose lives have been affected, in some cases violently affected, by individuals who acted in their own self-interest without regard for others, common decency, or the rule of law.  In every instance, I saw well-meaning, compassionate, intelligent people attempt to mediate between the bully and the victim, and the outcome was always the same.

Bullies win.  Every time.  As long as the response to bullying is anywhere on the normal spectrum of human reaction, bullies win because they don’t play by any rules.

Narcissists are not simply self-centered or self-absorbed; We’re all self-centered and self-absorbed to some degree; even Gandhi and the Dalai Lama had to work to escape the self.  Most of us at times hold exaggerated appreciation of our own abilities and our own capacities, and most of behave in our own self-interest for some (ok, most) of the time.  But .. .we can summon empathy for others, feel some regret for behaviors that have been harmful, occasionally see ourselves as we are.  We may fall into selfish behavior, but we don’t feel great about that behavior when our selfishness is noticed, and although our attitudes may not always be altruistic and charitable, we exhibit a range of responses to the world and our experiences; we aren’t stuck in one persistent and malevolent self-aggrandizing mode of being over considerable periods of time.

Truly malevolent narcissists belong to a special cadre of personality disordered, mentally ill people whose qualities include profoundly exaggerated grandiosity, a grotesque sense of entitlement, and consistent exploitation of others to assure their personal gains.  The emotional tapestry of the narcissistic disordered person pulses with feelings of envy and aggression; this person is often fearlessly exhibitionistic, consistently anticipates betrayal, metes out punishment for perceived disloyalty or lack of approval.  Words such as dominating, vindictive, contemptuous describe the true narcissist, and relationships with this type of disordered person are characterized by  manipulation and exploitation.

One school of psychology focuses on “The dark triad”, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, the three overlapping traits that describe what can be called the malevolent personality.  Leaving conceptual descriptors aside, and bidding a fond farewell to diagnostic markers, the most pertinent reality about malevolent personalities is that they are among us.  I’ve heard fictional Jay Gatsby described as a narcissist, and Charles Foster Kane, but despite the all-absorbing and needy ego of characters such as these, despite their grandiosity, they don’t behave sociopathologically; they don’t set out to destroy people they believe to have been critical of them or less than loyal.  This is where the earlier reference to bullying comes into play. Bullies want what they want, they enforce an outcome that suits them, and they don’t mind the distress and pain they inflict; they feel entitled to  control and disable a lesser person.

I can’t guess at the number of domestic abusers who are narcissistic, but abuse arrives as vindictive and personal violence; no matter whether it is physical, psychological, verbal, financial, or sexual- it’s personal.  That is the bald fact of abuse.  Narcissist abuse is ugly, often publicly ugly, and yet it goes unchecked.  Narcissists invite those in a relationship  to play a game they cannot win because the narcissist makes the rules, and the rules only apply to others.

Negotiating with bullies means bullies always win.

I started with flying monkeys and need to tie their behavior to the dismaying reality that narcissists find the people they need to excuse and protect their behavior. While the witch stays out of the line of fire, her minions carry out her evil plans.  The difference out here, away from Oz, is that these flying monkeys often have no idea that they are being used.  They may feel needed, or endorsed, or emotionally blackmailed so that they apologize for the narcissist, inadvertently spy or carry gossip.  The narcissist is expert at playing the victim, turning the tables so that his or her target is blamed for the bad behavior the narcissist is forced to display.  When a direct attack might be dangerous or impolitic, the narcissist selects people who have reason or the inclination to attack and send them out to lead the charge.  It isn’t hard to know who gets a charge out of gossiping, who is inclined toward resentment, who has grudges or prejudices; they are the obvious foot soldiers.  Equally vulnerable are people who wholeheartedly believe in the inherent goodness of mankind.

“There are two sides to every story”, “She didn’t really mean what she said”, “You have to understand where he comes from,” “Everyone snaps a little now and then”, “Don’t you think he brought that on himself?”.  One of the many shocking aspects of the recent documentary and filmed series on the trial of O.J. Simpson was that his friends and acquaintances knew that he had brutalized Nicole Brown Simpson over the course of several years, but discounted the possibility that Simpson could have killed the mother of his children.  Until the end, they apologized for O.J. and discounted the accounts of his rage and jealousy.

There may be two sides to every story, but we will never get to hear Nicole’s.  Apparently he really did mean what he said when he threatened to kill her.  Many, many people came from the tough background that O.J. escaped.  Snapping now and then does not include double homicide.  I’m not inclined to agree that Nicole or the collaterally dispatched Ron Goldman brought murder on themselves.

In the end, however, children are always the most vulnerable to narcissistic manipulation.

Even well modulated parents will occasionally slip, presenting themselves to their children as the better parent.  “I know Mom doesn’t let you stay up to watch Saturday Night Live, but I don’t think that’s such a big deal.”  Not good.  Not helpful.  Ordinarily that sort of self-aggrandizing ploy ends up with a conversation between parents, who as partners, are determined to respect and support each other.

I don’t know if my wife’s father was a narcissist.  I have reason to think he was somewhere on the spectrum of narcissistic behavior as he compelled his children to testify against their mother in court when he sought a less costly divorce settlement.  It’s one thing to throw a partner under a bus, quite another to ask her children to do the throwing.

It is difficult to deal with a narcissist when you are a grown, independent, fully functioning adult. The children of narcissists have an especially difficult burden, for they lack the knowledge, power, and resources to deal with their narcissistic parents without becoming their victims. Whether cast into the role of Scapegoat or Golden Child, the Narcissist’s Child never truly receives that to which all children are entitled: a parent’s unconditional love.

The blogsite, The Narcissist’s Child, encourages children of narcissistic parents to tell their story and find support in the company of others who understand the legacy of growing up with a narcissistic parent.  It was on that site, in the entry “Flying Monkeys in your life”, that I found devastating accounts of how the narcissist’s minions operate.

As has been the case in almost all that I write, this piece came to me without my intending to look at the subject at all.  A semi-whimsical search for an image carried me far from whimsy to something like comprehension of events in my own life that have long seemed inexplocable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vulgarians At The Gates

Vulgarians At The Gates

I’m a modern man, quasi-modern anyway, and yet, despite having read widely and having watched any number of foul-mouthed stand-up comedians and virtually everything Quentin Tarantino has written or directed, I am still a little bit shocked when I hear what was once called “blue” language or swearing – obscenities, anatomically graphic descriptions of perfectly normal bodily functions, and blasphemy.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not necessarily critical of that kind of language; in many cases, it hardly registers (another issue for another day), and when used judiciously (another issue) often very effective.  What interests me is not that you swear or Tarantino’s characters swear, or any public figure swears, or even my own kids swear, but that I still feel embarrassed when I use these sorts of words outside of very close friendships.  If I’ve whacked myself with a hammer, a common outcome of my efforts at home improvement, I try to say “Shazbat!!” or “Blast!”, or, most laughably, “Son of a Sea Cook”, fail most of the time, but regret that failure almost as much as I regret whacking myself with a hammer.  It’s almost impossible to quote contemporary speech without encountering  a slew of words once considered offensive, so I find myself dancing around the danger zones, hoping the person with whom I’m speaking will get the gist of the reference without my having to dive into the deep end of the pool.  Those “So and So’s”!

I wasn’t raised with missionaries; I’m not sure where these taboos were hatched. I do remember the concern my mother and grandmother had about my use of what they called vulgarisms.  They didn’t swear (my mother used “Ships!”when aggrieved), and I didn’t swear much, certainly not in front of them, but I did use terms commonly tossed around at school and in most settings other than my grandmother’s house.  I’m not sure when I became aware of the dissonance between the language “out there”, language my grandmother would have called vulgar and proper English usage, but correction came early and often.

Vulgar.  It’s not a word with much currency these days; we’ve sailed into a nether world of routine vulgarity, pretty much found in ordinary speech, G rated movies, and mainstream television.  I’m not talking about those words that are consigned to cable television, words which bring the R rating.  I’m talking about words and phrases which in my youth were never used in polite company such as “damn”, “hell”, “crap”, “bastard”, “sucks”, “piss”, “pissed off”, “bitch”, “balls”, “effing”, “fricking”, “dick”, “whore”. I’ve used them all, probably in a single sentence, and yet, I find myself blushing as I put these words in print.

Exasperated?  Fed up?  Ok, then you might say something like “Darn!”  “Shoot!”, “Fiddlesticks!”, “Shucks!”  Even then, on thin ice.  As I look back (as it were), I’m amused at the number of words we found to describe the human posterior, all of which would then have been considered vulgar – behind, rear, rear end, tail, bottom, can, fanny, butt, buttocks, caboose, buns, heinie (probably from hindquarter?), backside, derriere, rump, seat, haunches, keister, patootie.  People made jokes about donkeys knowing that the word ass could refer to the mammal, but I recall being heartily amused when someone in 5th grade called me a “half-ass”; the image was just too absurd.

This was an era in which families corrected children who said can instead of may, as in, “Can I have a glass of lemonade? ” an error of such obvious injury that it was immediately followed by parental instruction, “May I have a glass of lemonade?”

“Hey,” one might have said, “You know what I mean.”

At which point, the same parents would respond, “Hay is for horses”, almost certainly ensuring that further efforts at communication were useless.

This was an era in which children informed their parents that they had to do Number One or Number Two and so were led to the potty.  Yikes!

My life changed forever when my parents pulled me from the comfy public school in my home town to send me to the fancy private boarding school (in my home town), a shift that I believe was the result of my having become too vulgar for their taste.  Not only had I learned to spit, and I mean spit really well, but I had become quite comfortable using the word, Ain’t.  I think that was the straw that broke the camel’s hindquarters.

Elvis Presley was an inescapable force of nature in my formative years, and his locutions struck me as pretty cool, cool also being a word my parents could not abide.  “You ain’t never caught a rabbit and you ain’t no friend of mine.”  Double negatives aside, ain’t never and ain’t no tugged at my folks’ sense of propriety, and, looking back at it, probably put a dent in the image that they had of themselves as highly educated, culturally sophisticated, and thoroughly refined.  Vulgar, as I see it now, was a class thing.  Ain’t no doubt.

It worked, of course.  I stopped saying Ain’t.  I did, however, begin to hear the kind of schoolboy humor that warped my understanding of the relationship between men and women and taught me a vocabulary that would have made my grandmother turn purple.  When I think of what passed for humor in the darkened dormitory (no doors, beds separated by curtains), I wonder how any of us managed to negotiate the world with any semblance of grace.

Without dropping into yet another paen to the legendary heroes of my youth, let me simply say that I took great pleasure in listening to baseball games broadcast after the lights were killed in the dormitory.  Headphones would have been a fantastic, futuristic invention , so I had to pull my radio under my blankets and lie, sweating, with my ear to the speaker.  The voice I heard was that of Red Barber, “The Ol’ Redhead”, raised in Mississippi, possibly the most conscientiously neutral and deliberate of broadcasters, who, in a sweetly thick southern drawl, expressed strong feelings with exclamations such as “Oh, Doctor, that ball is gone!”.  When a team was doing well, he would say, “They’re tearing up the pea patch!”

Whats the point of introducing Red Barber?  Years later, I hear Barber explain that he never swore because he was concerned that in a moment of passion, he might let loose with an obscenity.  As a teacher, I understood completely.  Did I slip?  Probably, but I can’t remember a truly egregious gaffe, in part because I take words seriously and spent a fair amount of time correcting the can and may, his and their, and not simply correcting but responding unhappily to sucks and pissed.

I don’t think of myself as a fossil or dinosaur, but when it comes to contemporary usage, I’m positively Paleozoic.  So, let the vulgarities fly; fiddlesticks, I say, Oh, Doctor, what the heck, not a blessed thing I can do about it.

 

 

Going To The Dogs

Going To The Dogs

Jinx, our eldest dog, is at my elbow, panting as she has for several months.  She’s fourteen and her breathing is labored.  She has trouble now getting up the few steps into the house and sleeps soundly in the morning as the younger dogs bound into the day.  She has the run of the house, gets extra meals, and is generally cherished round the clock.  She may fool us all and live for years, or, as we fear, may not respond as we try to rouse her one morning.

The next generations of dogs, son, Satch, daughter Rogue, and grandson, Banner, all border collies, seem in no hurry to change the routines established over time.  They are happy to romp on their own, but when Jinx is in the mix, they still line-up by age, responding to the games Jinx initiates.  Jinx may be a matriarch in decline, but she remains playful and eager to herd us, nudging us when we slow to a walk.  Satch, a blue merle with the face of a panda, is generally sedentary and always hungry.  He is transformed when Jinx begins to bounce in place, nipping at her tail, frequently trotting away in triumph with a spume of white fur at the corner of his mouth.  Rogue, fox faced and busy, accomplishes two tasks at once, joining the pack’s pursuit of Jinx while carrying a frisbee, should an empty moment present itself.  Banner, gawky adolescent, misses cues, invades personal canine space, bounds away barking, distracted by a goose flying overhead.

I met my wife and her dog simultaneously; she met my son at the same time.  We knew from the start that our life together would include kids and dogs.  Fortunately, her dog, a large Shepard mix with exceedingly discriminating taste in humans, came to love us, and we loved him with the giddy love that dog-deprived dog lovers feel when they meet a perfect dog.  I held that dog in my arms as he died, and told my wife it would take some time before I could love a dog so completely again.  The heart wants what the heart wants, however, and soon she came home with a rescue that needed to be loved and cared for.

I contributed my own questionable judgment when visiting friends with German Shepherd puppies bred from a line of schutzhund champions.  One of the pups followed me, falling asleep on my feet as we talked about the litter.  I was sunk, and, having misplaced confidence in my ability to read German, thought a schutzhund, meant “obedience dog”,  exactly right for my wife’s work with therapy dogs and with dog obedience; it turns out that a schutzhund is actually a canine rocket, the sort of dog used by police canine units or in the military.  Our rocket turned out to be a sweetheart with floppy bat ears.  We named him Fledermaus, Maus for short, and loved him too.

Our first true therapy dog , later our first agility dog, a tri-colored Australian Shepherd, came to us from a breeder in Wisconsin, an adventure in cross country conversation that involved papers faxxed back and forth so that when the puppy arrived, my wife named him Fax.  He was irresistibly affectionate, and I joined our children in slipping him treats, probably undoing all the training my wife had begun.  He achieved some local fame when, sensing the opportunities available at a reception for a visiting poet, was discovered on a table top, his muzzle a tell-tale lemon bar yellow.  He was soon joined by Blitz, a speedy border collie we thought a prospective agility champion.  Instead, gentle Blitz turned out to be a champion therapy dog; the picture of him extended to his full length on a hospital bed, nuzzling a child fighting cancer, is still prominently placed on the clinic’s wall.

About twenty years into our marriage, about the time we went from two dogs to three, about the time that I came to expect that every article of clothing I owned would be caked with dog fur, about the time that our youngest dog ate the laundry room wall, I wondered if we had lost some balance in our life as a family.

At that time, it happened that I had an obligation away from home, so packed and headed for the airport, being sure to scruffle all three beasts before leaving the house.  As I waited to check in for my flight, I noticed a passenger travelling with a wire-haired terrier and had to walk over to see if the owner would mind a short visit with her dog.  Walking through the streets of an unfamiliar city, I again found myself approaching every dog that crossed my path.  Before two days away from home had passed, I realized that just as I loved my wife, loved my children, I loved having dogs within easy reach, essentially at that point, the more, the merrier.

So, now we live with four, which is great, but a Facebook friend has been posting pictures of her Australian Shepherd puppy, and it has been years since we had an Australian Shepherd, and they are fluffy with a tiny bobbed tail that vibrates with joy when greeting its owners, and not all that large, and easy to train, and ….